Re: The tainted message

From: Ian Molton (spyro@armlinux.org)
Date: Mon Apr 29 2002 - 12:43:31 EST


tomas szepe Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:

> > Warning: The module (%s) does not seem to have a compatible license.
> > Please contact the supplier of this module regarding any
> > problems, or reproduce the problem after rebooting without
> > ever loading this module.
> >
> > shorter?
>
> I don't think you can strip the part about open-ness of the code --
> it's an essential part of the explanation. And "any problems" might
> be too broad.

Moreover, I think the 'compatible license thing doesnt fly.

the argument against CLOSE modules is that they make the _whole_package_
undebuggable.

if the source is available, no matter HOW crippling its license, the
package _IS_ debuggable.

thie warning should be:

Warning: Module %s is not open source, and as such, loading it will make
your kernel un-debuggable. Please do not submit bug reports from a kernel
with this module loaded, as they will be useless, and likely ignored.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 30 2002 - 22:00:18 EST