Re: Microcode update driver

From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (roy@karlsbakk.net)
Date: Sat Apr 27 2002 - 14:42:10 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] (repost) kmem_cache_zalloc"
Previous message: Witek Krêcicki: "ext2 fs corruption on 2.5.10"
In reply to: Matthew M: "Re: Microcode update driver"
Next in thread: GertJan Spoelman: "Re: Microcode update driver"
Reply: GertJan Spoelman: "Re: Microcode update driver"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Matthew M wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Saturday 27 April 2002 7:57 pm, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> > Sorry if this is a FAQ, but where's the microcode.dat supposed to be
> > placed? I can't find any information about that in the doc.
>
> /usr/share/misc/microcode.dat

hm... but... Isn't the microcode update being done during kernel boot?
I rarely have a system set up with /usr on the same fs as /

roy

-- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester

Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] (repost) kmem_cache_zalloc"
Previous message: Witek Krêcicki: "ext2 fs corruption on 2.5.10"
In reply to: Matthew M: "Re: Microcode update driver"
Next in thread: GertJan Spoelman: "Re: Microcode update driver"
Reply: GertJan Spoelman: "Re: Microcode update driver"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 30 2002 - 22:00:15 EST