On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter
<christoph@lameter.com> wrote:
> That stuff might be useful in a CVS or BK() source code archive.
> What is the purpose of releasing a kernel tarball that does not compile?
> Kernel tarball are there to be compiled and tried out ....
>
MAN! You said a mouth full. I've found syntax errors, misspellings and
just plain old junk text in the make files of 2.5.10.
I appreciate the efforts going into the new kernel tree. I really look
forward to it becoming main stream... but MY GOD, at least I wish they
would try to compile the thing BEFORE it gets posted for download!
--************************************************************************* ***** Registered Linux User Number 185956 http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux 2:04pm up 45 days, 19:20, 2 users, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.00 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 30 2002 - 22:00:14 EST