Uz.ytkownik Pavel Machek napisa?:
>>+ if (stat & READY_STAT)
>>+ printk("DriveReady ");
>>+ if (stat & WRERR_STAT)
>>+ printk("DeviceFault ");
>>+ if (stat & SEEK_STAT)
>>+ printk("SeekComplete ");
>>+ if (stat & DRQ_STAT)
>>+ printk("DataRequest ");
>>+ if (stat & ECC_STAT)
>>+ printk("CorrectedError ");
>>+ if (stat & INDEX_STAT)
>>+ printk("Index ");
>>+ if (stat & ERR_STAT)
>>+ printk("Error ");
>> }
>> printk("}");
>>-#endif /* FANCY_STATUS_DUMPS */
>>+#endif
>> printk("\n");
>> if ((stat & (BUSY_STAT|ERR_STAT)) == ERR_STAT) {
>> err = GET_ERR();
>
>
> I believe this is actually making it *less* readable.
It makes the waste of stack setup code and call instructions
more obvious then the former, so the chances are better that I will
come back and compactize the actually generated code a bit ;-)
BTW> Redundant comments can only be false. Like the following:
#ifdef DEFINE
#endif /* DEFINE */
/*
* some_function() is used for this and that
*/
some_function()
{
for (;;)
{
} /* for */
} /* some_function() */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 30 2002 - 22:00:13 EST