Re: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Wed Apr 24 2002 - 06:33:57 EST

Next message: Dave Jones: "Re: BUG: 2.4.19-pre6aa1 (i586) ?"
Previous message: Dennis Schoen: "Re: BUG: 2.4.19-pre6aa1 (i586) ?"
In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 10:03:31AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:

> http://ftp.??.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/dwmw2/bk-2.5/
> http://ftp.??.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/
>
> The individual patches look sane - I'm not entirely sure about the 'Full
> patch' version, which seems to contain stuff not in the individual patches.

Just an added vote of confidence,..
They looked sane enough that I used them to sync my tree up to a few
csets short of 2.5.9 over the weekend, (after 2.5.9 final I diffed the
tree with csets -> 2.5.9 and then merged that).

The only time this method of me keeping up with Linus falls over is when
files move or are deleted. No patch seems to be deleted there, so
there's nothing for me to apply.. I can live with this though.

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dave Jones: "Re: BUG: 2.4.19-pre6aa1 (i586) ?"
Previous message: Dennis Schoen: "Re: BUG: 2.4.19-pre6aa1 (i586) ?"
In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 30 2002 - 22:00:09 EST