Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 18:08:43 EST


Hi!

> > The well-defined resync points are the 2.5.N releases. If -pre goes away,
> > then the dot-releases might need to come a little closer together, that's all.
>
> I agree.
>
> I've told myself that I shouldn't have done "-preX" releases at all in
> 2.5.x - the "real" numbers have become diluted by them, and I suspect the
> -pre's are really just because I got used to making them during the
> over-long 2.4.x time.

I believe -pre's are still important. Daily snapshots are too likely to be
broken, and "real" releases are different from -pre ones (with *usefull*
difference): you can ignore -pre release, but you can't ignore real release
(because real releases are relative to each other).

Having slightly more frequent real releases would be nice, but I believe
it is not feasible to make them as common as pre- patches.
                                                                Pavel

-- 
Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:36 EST