Re: [CFT][PATCH] (1/5) sane procfs/dcache interaction

From: Hanna Linder (hannal@us.ibm.com)
Date: Mon Apr 22 2002 - 13:58:39 EST


--On Saturday, April 20, 2002 13:56:35 -0400 Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> wrote:

> Patchset eliminates a _lot_ of allocation/freeing/guaranteed negative dcache
> lookups for procfs. It seems to be working here, but I would really appreciate
> help with testing/review.
>
> First chunk follows, the rest will go in separate mails.
>
> diff -urN C8-0/include/linux/sched.h C8-unhash_process/include/linux/sched.h
> --- C8-0/include/linux/sched.h Sun Apr 14 17:53:12 2002
> +++ C8-unhash_process/include/linux/sched.h Fri Apr 19 01:16:35 2002

Patch 1 of 5 failed to apply to 2.5.8.
Which version are these built against?

Hanna
hannal@us.ibm.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:32 EST