Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...
From: Larry McVoy (lm@bitmover.com)
Date: Mon Apr 22 2002 - 12:48:57 EST
- Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:44:43PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > > Do you have a problem with moving other docs out to Websites, which are
> > > > describing closed-spec hardware? Such hardware (and their vendors) are
> > > > actively anti-open source, yet we have documents describing those, too.
>
> As far as I can see: question about moving the jfs CVS docs out of the tree
> as well, answered fully and, imho, correctly by me.
What part of "describing closed-spec hardware" did you not understand?
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:32 EST