Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Mon Apr 22 2002 - 08:08:19 EST

Next message: Matthew D. Pitts: "Impressions of 2.5.8"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
Next in thread: dean gaudet: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:05:27PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Sunday 21 April 2002 10:31, Russell King wrote:
> > We have hourly snapshots, thanks to the work David Woodhouse and
> > Rik van Riel did at a moments notice. Does this satisfy your
> > concerns above?
>
> Interesting. How does that work, exactly?

If you want details of this, go grab the publically accessible
scripts that these guys worked on. Just don't ask me.

I'm no longer interested in this BK anti BK crap. Take it elsewhere.

-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matthew D. Pitts: "Impressions of 2.5.8"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
Next in thread: dean gaudet: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:30 EST