On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:05:27 -0400 (EDT)
Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> wrote:
> As one of the guys who doesn't use BK _and_ had submitted a lot of patches
> since Linus had started using it, I'm probably qualified to tell whether it
> hurts or not, right? Well, it doesn't. So far the only difference was
> in the quality (and latency) of changelogs and that was definitely welcome.
"me too". Actually, I found it easier to get the Trivial patches in, and
about the same for per-cpu and futex patches. I don't bk.
When patches didn't go in, it's more due to Mingo Theorum[1] than being
non-bk. And that's a Good Thing for calibrating my coding tastes upwards.
Rusty.
[1] Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201291324560.3610-100000@localhost.localdomain>
-- there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:30 EST