Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

From: Anton Altaparmakov (aia21@cantab.net)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 12:05:43 EST

Hi,

At 17:46 21/04/02, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > >Wrong. Many corporate firewalls allow email and http (both via proxy) and
> > >reject any other traffic. CVS and BK are both unusable in this
> > >environment.
> >
> > Not wrong. BK works fine over http protocol. CVS is another matter which I
> > cannot comment on...
>
>Ok, but there are other scenarios where only email is available (often via
>mail gateways like softswitch on os/390)...

Then use BK over email then (to submit a patch of your last change set for
example you would do "bk export -tpatch -r+", and the receiving end does a
simple "cat emailmessagetext | bk receive" and that's it done.

Obviously you haven't looked at bitkeeper... (-;

Anton

ps. You better be prepared to accept very large emails if you want to send
a whole linux kernel repository by email though! Never mind if you are
using bitkeeper or just a tar ball! 

-- 
   "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown
-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cantab.net> (replace at with @)
Linux NTFS Maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.openprojects.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:29 EST