Re: ext3: i_blocks is xx, should be yy

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 11:35:35 EST

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
Previous message: dean gaudet: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
In reply to: Jan Niehusmann: "ext3: i_blocks is xx, should be yy"
Next in thread: Jan Niehusmann: "Re: ext3: i_blocks is xx, should be yy"
Reply: Jan Niehusmann: "Re: ext3: i_blocks is xx, should be yy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 06:29:15PM +0200, Jan Niehusmann wrote:
> On an (otherwise clean, and cleanly unmounted) ext3 partition, I got
> some ext2fs errors like the following:
>
> Inode 295208, i_blocks is 112, should be 8. Fix<y>?

Did the filesystem run out of free blocks at any point?

If so, the following could explain it:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=101778284030725&w=2

-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
Previous message: dean gaudet: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
In reply to: Jan Niehusmann: "ext3: i_blocks is xx, should be yy"
Next in thread: Jan Niehusmann: "Re: ext3: i_blocks is xx, should be yy"
Reply: Jan Niehusmann: "Re: ext3: i_blocks is xx, should be yy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:29 EST