Re: Intel Speedstep technology switch

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 08:05:59 EST

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
Previous message: Anton Blanchard: "[PATCH] double down() in nfsd_symlink"
In reply to: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: Intel Speedstep technology switch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:49:30AM -0400, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> We're getting close. Right now AMD K6+, K7 PowerNOW
> (AMD speak for Speedstep) is supported, as well as Cyrix cpus. Intel
> is lagging a bit due to Intel not giving
> specs; but the reverse engineering is making progress on this part.

Yup, Dominik Brodowski has done quite a bit of work recently, and is
'almost there' with the newer style of speedstep. (The one used in ICH
chipsets), the older BX chipset style of speedstep still needs some
thinking.

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
Previous message: Anton Blanchard: "[PATCH] double down() in nfsd_symlink"
In reply to: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: Intel Speedstep technology switch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:28 EST