On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:40:11AM -0400, Skip Ford wrote:
> That's only 1 aspect. The frustrating part is bug reports mailed to the
> list getting a response of "oh, that's fixed in the latest bk tree."
>
> That's happened a dozen times in the last week...no wonder non-bk users
> feel out of the loop. I've been staring at the code for a lot of years
> and it's finally just starting to make sense to me, now by the time I see
> it the core hackers have moved on to something else.
>
> Daily snapshots would be great.
We have hourly snapshots, thanks to the work David Woodhouse and
Rik van Riel did at a moments notice. Does this satisfy your
concerns above?
I have a suspicion that the problem of conflicting obvious fixes
won't go away.
There's another interesting twist here... - I didn't see any of them on
linux-kernel.
<joke>
I'm a BK user! GNU patches are being submitted behind my back without
discussion on linux-kernel. I'm going to remove the SubmittingPatches
document! It's harming discussion of patches on linux-kernel.
</joke>
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:28 EST