Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...
From: Ian Molton (spyro@armlinux.org)
Date: Sat Apr 20 2002 - 23:31:43 EST
- Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- In reply to: Alexander Viro: "BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Alexander Viro Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:
>
> As one of the guys who doesn't use BK _and_ had submitted a lot of
> patches since Linus had started using it, I'm probably qualified to tell
> whether it hurts orSure, except no-one cares about this point.
Sure, except no-one cares about this point.
the documentation is the 'sticky wicket'...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- In reply to: Alexander Viro: "BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:28 EST