Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

From: Stelian Pop (stelian.pop@fr.alcove.com)
Date: Sat Apr 20 2002 - 17:30:24 EST


On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 12:01:35AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> My conclusion: though there are more BK patches being applied to Linus's
> tree than non-BK, they are generating less discussion on lkml than non-BK
> patches do. Or to put it bluntly: BK patches are not being discussed.

Or maybe using a SCM puts more pressure on the developper which
writes better code, which will get accepted with less discussion.

In general, when you seek discussion with a quick and dirty piece
of code, you post a patch, not the BK equivalent, since you know
this will not get accepted anyway...

Stelian.

-- 
Stelian Pop <stelian.pop@fr.alcove.com>
Alcove - http://www.alcove.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:27 EST