Re: [PATCH] modularization of mem_init() for 2.4.19pre7

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org)
Date: Thu Apr 18 2002 - 13:28:29 EST


On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:17:22AM -0700, Patricia Gaughen wrote:
> -void __init mem_init(void)
> +void __init init_one_highpage(struct page *page, int pfn, int bad_ppro)
> +{
> + if (!page_is_ram(pfn)) {
> + SetPageReserved(page);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (bad_ppro && page_kills_ppro(pfn))
> + {
> + SetPageReserved(page);
> + return;
> + }

I'd suggest to stay with one coding style. Prefferedly that would be
the one in Documentation/CodingStyle.

> +
> + reservedpages = 0;
> + for (pfn = 0; pfn < max_low_pfn; pfn++)
> + /*
> + * Only count reserved RAM pages
> + */
> + if (page_is_ram(pfn) && PageReserved(mem_map+pfn))
> + reservedpages++;

Adding braces around this hughe loop body would make it a little
more readable..

Besides these minor style nitpicks the pages look good to me.

BTW: Where is the NUMA code that builds ontop of this?

        Christoph

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:21 EST