On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 08:28:19AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> Adam Kropelin wrote:
> > Even though clustered_apic_mode is 0, the compiler still complains
> > about the second one and the first one doesn't depend on
> > clustered_apic_mode at all.
>
> Hmmm ... not sure why the compiler complains about the second one,
> that's very strange ;-)
I agree. The cpp ouput clealy shows
if ((0) && (numnodes > 1)) {
so I'm not sure why there's a problem.
> I wonder if we can play the same trick we've played before ....
> haven't tested the appended, but maybe it, or something like it
> will work without the ifdef's?
IMHO, this sort of trickery in the name of improving readability
is misguided. To me, anyway, the #ifdef's are much easer to read than
magic name-changing macros buried in a header somewhere.
--Adam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:19 EST