Re: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ?

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
Date: Tue Apr 16 2002 - 19:22:28 EST


Followup to: <E16xTTd-0008Va-00@the-village.bc.nu>
By author: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> > I seem to recall from theory that the 100HZ is human dependent. Any
> > higher and you would begin to notice delays from you input until
> > whatever program you're talking to responds.
>
> Ultimately its because Linus pulled that number out of a hat about ten years
> ago. For some workloads 1KHz is much better, for others like giant number
> crunching people actually drop it down to about 5..
>

Hardly so. 100 Hz was standard on most commercial Unices around the
time the first Linux was done...

        -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<amsp@zytor.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:16 EST