> Please tell us that primary framebuffer/input/console development will
> continue in the CVS drop-in tree on SourceForge? Bitkeeper is unable to
> support this (easier, more efficient) style of development.
Could you please explain why you think CVS is easier and more efficient?
Last I checked, BK was a superset of CVS, but could be used pretty much
identically to CVS if that's what you want.
-- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:16 EST