Re: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ?

From: David Mosberger (davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com)
Date: Tue Apr 16 2002 - 11:50:21 EST


>>>>> On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 16:27:12 +0000 (UTC), torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) said:

  Linus> And I've had some Intel people grumble about it, because it
  Linus> apparently means that the timer tick takes anything from 2%
  Linus> to an extreme of 10% (!!) of the CPU time under certain
  Linus> loads.

I'm not sure I believe this. I have had occasional cases where I
wondered whether the timer tick caused significant overhead, but it
always turned out to be something else. In my measurements,
*user-level* profiling has the 2-10% overhead you're mentioning, but
that's with a signal delivered to user level on each tick.

        --david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:15 EST