On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Which requires the user to use something like
> > > >
> > > > for_each_zone(zone) {
> > > > ...
> > > > } end_zone;
>
> > Ugh. If we're going to use such ugly things, it would be nice if they were
> > do_zone/while_zone instead of being suggestive of a for loop.
>
> Ummm, it _is_ a for loop.
Conceptually, sure, but the underlying macros Linus suggested made it
do/while. As the do/while form is the only control structure in C where we
have something that looks like an expression after a block, naming it for_
seems terribly incongruous. Naming it do_/while_ would make it slightly
less ugly, at least to my eyes, and serve to remind that both parts are
essential.
-- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:15 EST