Hi,
Alex Riesen wrote:
> I would appreciate somewhat more readability, though. It's not very
> simple to figure out in which state an option is (Y/N/M) if it's not focused.
> Maybe put the selected variant before the option name:
> + Networking options
> + Packet socket
> | <M> Netlink device emulation
> | <N> Network packet filtering ...
Hmm, looks good, the current version has the advantage, that one sees
the available input range, but that's probably only important for
debugging.
So far I want to keep it simple, it should be just enough for people to
play with and for me to experiment with some ideas. Anything more fancy
has to wait.
> Besides, i think your selection of qt as gui platform is not making you
> many friends, though greatly speeded up the development.
"And I personally refuse to use inferior tools because of ideology." :)
It's not the first time I hear this, I'd really like to know where this
is coming from. I don't mind if someone implements the ui with another
toolkit, I'd actually be happy about this, as the ui part is more of a
burden for me, but until then I keep things simple for myself.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 23 2002 - 22:00:19 EST