Re: bit ops on unsigned long?

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Mon Mar 18 2002 - 01:03:30 EST


David S. Miller wrote:

> From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 14:08:08 +1100
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> /* Set the preempt count _outside_ the spinlocks! */
> idle->thread_info->preempt_count = (idle->lock_depth >= 0);
> +#endif
>
>This part of your patch has to go. Every port must
>provide the preempt_count member of thread_info regardless
>of the CONFIG_PREEMPT setting.
>

Even if the port doesn't support CONFIG_PREEMPT at all?

    Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 23 2002 - 22:00:14 EST