Re: 2.4.18 Preempt Freezeups

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Sat Mar 16 2002 - 18:51:27 EST


On March 15, 2002 03:28 pm, Alan Cox wrote:
> > What is required for preempt beyond "SMP safe" code? I thought the whole
> > idea was to make the preemptions transparent to other code by utilizing
> > the SMP critical regions?
>
> SMP safe code
> Actual source code when recompiling modules
> Reviewing things like driver code use of disable_irq by hand
> Reviewing driver code for situations where it requires a small timing delay
> and a large one is unacceptable

Has anyone found one of those yet?

> Checking anywhere you use the cpu id that you don't do somthing where it
> might change under you (eg per cpu variables)

Is per-cpu data the whole list there?

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 23 2002 - 22:00:12 EST