Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers

• Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.x write barriers (updated for ext3)"
• Previous message: Jean Tourrilhes: "IrDA patches on the way..."
• Maybe in reply to: The Open Source Club at The Ohio State University : "Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers"
• Next in thread: Troy Benjegerdes: "Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

| The Open Source Club at The Ohio State University wrote:
| >
| > [ succinctness ]
| >

| fwiw, I prefer to not use bitkeeper, for the reasons which
| you outline.

| That's my choice. Others have made a different one. I ask that
| they ensure that their choice not inhibit my ability to contribute
| to Linux.

Well said, Andrew. And I agree completely.

 ~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.x write barriers (updated for ext3)"
• Previous message: Jean Tourrilhes: "IrDA patches on the way..."
• Maybe in reply to: The Open Source Club at The Ohio State University : "Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers"
• Next in thread: Troy Benjegerdes: "Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:48 EST