Re: [BUG] + [PATCH]: handling bad inodes in 2.4.x kernels

From: Daniel Mack (daniel@yoobay.net)
Date: Thu Feb 14 2002 - 21:13:42 EST


On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 07:33:19PM -0600, Ken Brownfield wrote:
> One could argue that a corrupt filesystem is a corrupt filesystem, but

but a corrupted filesystem should not change the behaviour of the entire
kernel. write-opening a bad inode should not end up with the effect that
the rename() syscall does not work anymore, i wasn't even able to securely
shut down by box everytime that happend.

> I've seen this behavior first hand (without using debugfs,
> unfortunately).

thats how i found that bug - it exists in real life.

> I think it's worth someone with filesystem fu taking a
> look at this patch. Or "seconded", whatever. :)

there's another possibilty for fixing this in my latest posting.

daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:01:05 EST