john slee wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:36:55AM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
>
>>If that's not part of the roadmap I'd be surprised,
>>since tux is so much more capable than the
>>khttpd which is currently part of the tree.
>>
>>Tux has clearly demonstrated it's performance
>>and low resource consumption.
>>
>
>it has also been demonstrated that equal performance can be had in
>userland (search archives for "X15")
>
Well, I don't know about "equal" but many
webservers have benefitted from the tux
related kernel enhancements - yes I know
about X15, I tested it out too...
It's fast, but tux is faster.
>. most of tux' improvements have
>been generalised and absorbed into the mainline kernel anyway.
>
Granted -
So, just out of curioisity, why is khttpd in
the kernel? If there were any web server
in the mainline kernel I'd think it'd be tux -
Best Regards,
Joe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:01:04 EST