> Is this the first in a multi-step patch series, or something like that?
What makes you ask that?
> You just duplicated code in a generic location and pasted it into the
> arch. Where's the gain in that? I do see the gain in letting the arch
> allocate the task struct, but surely your patch should provide a generic
> mechanism for an arch to call by default, instead of duplicating code??
Hmmm... Is it worth going through all fun of creating another CONFIG_xxxx
option to govern the inclusion of such code?
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:01:03 EST