Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.4.17] Your suggestions for fast path walk

From: Roman Zippel (zippel@linux-m68k.org)
Date: Thu Feb 14 2002 - 06:13:38 EST


Hi,

On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Hanna Linder wrote:

> - return NULL;
> + struct dentry *dentry = NULL;

Could you please configure your editor to use tabs instead of spaces?
It would make the patch smaller and easier to read.

> + if(flags & LOOKUP_LOCKED){

IMO it would be better to use a count, which limits to number of lookups
done with the spinlock held. This count could be put into nameidata, this
would change the prototype of cached_lookup/lookup_hash into using a
pointer to struct nameidata, but AFAICS it's not a really problem, as most
of the time the data is already available in a nameidata struct.
Since spinlocks are a dummy on UP, it would make sense to make this test a
inline function/macro, where it could be made a dummy as well.

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:01:00 EST