Well, with 2.5.5-pre1 i get this oops:
PAP-14030: direct2indirect: pasted or inserted byte exists in the
treeinvalid operand: 0000
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010:[<c0168dd9>] Not tainted
Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
EFLAGS: 00010286
eax: 00000049 ebx: c01f7a00 ecx: ffffffb7 edx: cfa01180
esi: c154a800 edi: ceeede80 ebp: ceeedda4 esp: ceeedd2c
ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Stack: c01f60da c02640c0 c01f7a00 ceeedd50 ceeedd8c cbe5c198 c0171df4 c154a800
c01f7a00 ceeede3c 00000000 cbe76b00 c154a800 00000000 00001000 00000000
cbe5c198 ceeedec0 00000713 00000714 00000001 fffffffe 0040ffff 00000cf4
Call Trace: [<c0171df4>] [<c016055f>] [<c016dba3>] [<c016e4bf>] [<c017283d>]
[<c0135cb1>] [<c013638e>] [<c015fb00>] [<c01624e8>] [<c015fb00>] [<c012953d>]
[<c013377b>] [<c010886f>]
Code: 0f 0b 68 c0 40 26 c0 b8 e0 60 1f c0 8d 96 cc 00 00 00 85 f6
>>EIP; c0168dd8 <reiserfs_panic+28/4c> <=====
Trace; c0171df4 <direct2indirect+d4/2d8>
Trace; c016055e <reiserfs_get_block+a5e/df4>
Trace; c016dba2 <is_tree_node+36/4c>
Trace; c016e4be <search_by_key+906/df0>
Trace; c017283c <get_cnode+10/78>
Trace; c0135cb0 <__block_prepare_write+8c/1f8>
Trace; c013638e <block_prepare_write+22/3c>
Trace; c015fb00 <reiserfs_get_block+0/df4>
Trace; c01624e8 <reiserfs_prepare_write+5c/64>
Trace; c015fb00 <reiserfs_get_block+0/df4>
Trace; c012953c <generic_file_write+45c/660>
Trace; c013377a <sys_write+8e/c4>
Trace; c010886e <syscall_call+6/a>
Code; c0168dd8 <reiserfs_panic+28/4c>
00000000 <_EIP>:
Code; c0168dd8 <reiserfs_panic+28/4c> <=====
0: 0f 0b ud2a <=====
Code; c0168dda <reiserfs_panic+2a/4c>
2: 68 c0 40 26 c0 push $0xc02640c0
Code; c0168dde <reiserfs_panic+2e/4c>
7: b8 e0 60 1f c0 mov $0xc01f60e0,%eax
Code; c0168de4 <reiserfs_panic+34/4c>
c: 8d 96 cc 00 00 00 lea 0xcc(%esi),%edx
Code; c0168dea <reiserfs_panic+3a/4c>
12: 85 f6 test %esi,%esi
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 06:15:24PM +0100, Luigi Genoni wrote:
> > It happened when I did reboot from 2.5.4-pre1 to 2.5.4, and my
> > /etc/rc.c/rc.local was full of 0s.
> > And when I did reboot from 2.5.3 to 2.5.3 on the other box and some c
> > source I was editing three ours before were full of 0s.
> There was a bug in kernels up to 2.5.4-pre1 (2.5.4-pre2 had a fix),
> which had similar symtoms.
>
> > > > I saw I am not the only one with this kind of corruption, I remember at
> > > > less one related mail.
> > > There was flaky hardware on the other report. And I think Alex Riesen
> > > cannot reproduce zero files anymore.
> > Those two boxes runned from more than 1 year and no HW problems before..
> Great.
> Thing is if you able to reproduce on 2.5.4-pre2+ without rebooting into earlier
> 2.5 kernels in-between tries, then it will mean something is not right even
> in latest kernels.
>
> Bye,
> Oleg
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:01:00 EST