On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:49:03AM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Dangerous advocacy of the broken SuS semantics for sync, has to be stamped
> out before it spreads ;-)
Daniel,
You seem to be taking both sides of this argument.
Do you agree that sync should be changed to a checkpoint so that doesn't
block for dirty data created *after* sync was called?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:59 EST