Re: [patch] sys_sync livelock fix

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Wed Feb 13 2002 - 20:27:39 EST


On February 14, 2002 01:53 am, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> >
> > What's the theory behind writing the data both before and after the commit?
>
> see fsync_dev(). It starts I/O against existing dirty data, then
> does various fs-level syncy things which can produce more dirty
> data - this is where ext3 runs its commit, via brilliant reverse
> engineering of its calling context :-(.

OK, so it sounds like cleaning that up with an ext3-specific super->sync would
be cleaner for what it's worth, and save a little cpu.

> It then again starts I/O against new dirty data then waits on it again. And
> then again. There's quite a lot of overkill there. But that's OK, as long
> as it terminates sometime.

/me doesn't comment

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:59 EST