On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 09:46:54PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 12 2002, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:17:48PM +0100, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> > >
> > > > So the conclusions is that not just the read_ahead array is bogous now.
> > > > The max_readahead array can be killed entierly from the kernel as well ;-).
> > > >
> > > > The answer is: I'm now confident that you can just remove all the
> > > > max_readahead initialization from the ide code.
> > >
> > > Since I've come to the same conclusion, here is the patch. It removes
> > > read_ahead, max_readahead, BLKRAGET, BLKRASET, BLKFRAGET and BLKFRASET
> > > completely.
> > >
> > > Comments, Jens?
> >
> > Could you battle it out, and I'll take a good look at the patch
> > tomorrow :-). I'm all for a bit of spring cleaning here, it's needed it
> > badly for quite a while.
>
> Basically the LOT of all of you are WRONG and quit submitting patches to
> try and dork up the works.
:) Somehow, I expected exactly this reply from you. Thanks for not
disappointing me.
> Since we already have added back one ratehole from 2.4 that Linus
> strictly forbid, I am glad to see everyone here is an expert!
> I just love how the copy of a request has worked its way back into to
> the code-base. :-/ I recall Linus stating it was/is a horrid mess.
Sorry, can't comment on this, the patch I did with Martin certainly
doesn't *add* anything.
-- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:52 EST