Re: Stable Kernel

From: Bill Davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
Date: Tue Feb 12 2002 - 23:01:53 EST

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "[RFC] [WIP] Shared page tables, first results"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [patch] sys_sync livelock fix"
In reply to: Erik Andersen: "Re: Stable Kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Erik Andersen wrote:

> On Tue Feb 12, 2002 at 07:33:23PM -0600, Ro0tSiEgE wrote:
> > What is the most stable/secure kernel version at this point?
>
> 2.0.39

One of the links between my fingers and the list is 2.0.33, but I would
not install anything but 2.4 on a new install. I get uptimes in the 200+
day range with 2.4 and far better performance and networking.

Note that I agree on what's most stable, but if the question is what
should I install, 2.4.xx is the choice. 2.4.13-ac was very stable, but I'm
sure 2.4.17-ac2 will be as well. Alan actually runs his kernels, so they
will compile and run.

-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "[RFC] [WIP] Shared page tables, first results"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [patch] sys_sync livelock fix"
In reply to: Erik Andersen: "Re: Stable Kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:52 EST