Re: [PATCH] 2.4.18-pre9, trylock for read/write semaphores

• Next message: Akarapu Mahesh: "doubt on auto tuning in 2.4 kernels"
• Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: What is a livelock? (was: [patch] sys_sync livelock fix)"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.18-pre9, trylock for read/write semaphores"
• Next in thread: David Howells: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.18-pre9, trylock for read/write semaphores"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > + new = old + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS;
> > + if (cmpxchg(&sem->count, old, new) == old)
> > + return 1;
>
> cmpxchg isnt present on i386

According to arch/i386/config.in, the generic spinlock version would be
used for vintage 386 chips. I think that's due to similar concerns about
the xadd instruction.

-- 
Brian Watson                | "Now I don't know, but I been told it's
Linux Kernel Developer      |  hard to run with the weight of gold,
Open SSI Clustering Project |  Other hand I heard it said, it's
Compaq Computer Corp        |  just as hard with the weight of lead."
Los Angeles, CA             |     -Robert Hunter, 1970
mailto:Brian.J.Watson@compaq.com
http://opensource.compaq.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Akarapu Mahesh: "doubt on auto tuning in 2.4 kernels"
• Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: What is a livelock? (was: [patch] sys_sync livelock fix)"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.18-pre9, trylock for read/write semaphores"
• Next in thread: David Howells: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.18-pre9, trylock for read/write semaphores"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:51 EST