Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Tue Feb 12 2002 - 19:52:20 EST


On February 12, 2002 11:54 pm, Larry McVoy wrote:
> And it's not like this makes arch bad, this is one place where it isn't as
> good as some other choices. But arch has other areas where it is better,
> it is less pedantic than most systems about what it will try and apply.
> It's the uber patch library if you ask me, and that has real value.
> Why the patchbot people haven't picked up on that is beyond me, they're
> off trying to write something "simple", which I think you'll agree is
> a strange, there is nothing simple about this problem space.

The patchbot people, at least one of them, is busy working on a totally
unrelated problem ;-)

I'm keeping an eye on this. The patchbot version 1.0 will in fact be simple
and useful at the same time or I'd better seriously consider retiring.

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:51 EST