Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
>>BTW.> Since there is no longer any difference about the request head
>>handling between IDE and SCSI, what about the idea of moving the whole
>>ide interface stuff under the umbrella of SCSI host adapter? This
>>would be a true cleanup and make the whole ide-scsi and ide-atapi mess
>>go away. IDE is moving fast toward SCSI on the logical level anyway
>>and it would make the hwif macro/lookup crap in the ide code go
>>magically way! At least this generic device handler search stuff
>>should be merged between them (I'm trully tempted to give it a shoot
>>this afternoon.) The only thing it could result in, which would maybe
>>surprise some would be the fact that the major of his root device
>>could just go suddenly away... But hey! What's the heck - we are in
>>odd kernel series anyway ;-).
>>
>
>This is an idea I'm toying with for quite a long time already. And I
>think this is a good idea as well. I have no more time to spend coding
>today, so if you have the afternoon, but I'll definitely find some to
>read the diff if you do this change!
>
Well could you do me a mall favour of dumping a combined ide cleanup
relative to 2.5.4 on me?
In contrast to Linus I don't like scattered patches ;-). I will at least
give it a deep code look today for the
ide-cdrom stuff, becouse it was always annoying to me that the default
distribution setup
is using the ide interface to my CD-recorder and every single recorder
aplication out there
is using the scsi interface instead.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:50 EST