Re: thread_info implementation

From: Roman Zippel (zippel@linux-m68k.org)
Date: Mon Feb 11 2002 - 19:01:50 EST


Hi,

I wrote:

> 1. I more liked the previous byte fields instead of the bitmasks.
> bitfield/bitmask instructions are at least 2 bytes longer than a simple
> test instruction for m68k.

Additional note: The currently used bitfield instruction can be quite
expensive, where all we need is an atomic read and write, but not an
atomic test/modify.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:44 EST