On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 12:50:02AM +0800, Laurence wrote:
> I'd like to be emailed comments or replies personally.
>
> Transaction TCP is an extension for TCP. Its performance advantage is
> indisputably better than standard TCP. But only FreeBSD integrates
> TTCP into its kernel. So, I've started T/TCP for Linux at
> http://ttcplinux.sourceforge.net or
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/ttcplinux. I'm writing the kernel
> patch for Linux kernel 2.4.2. Is anyone interested in it or have
> anything to say about T/TCP's pros and cons??
http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~mass/comm.html
http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~mass/forte96.html
There Mark Smith shows that T/TCP does not (in all error cases)
act the _same_ as TCP, although that does not necessarily mean
it would be wrong.
Reading W.R.Stevens' book "TCP/IP Illustriated, Volume 3"
gives a glimpse of how BSD did things in NET/3 code back
in early 1994-1996, and there I see many odd bits like
per-host route entires containing support data..
> Besides, I've finished some basic codes involving:
> 1. new structures
> 2. newly created or modified funtions mainly related to receiving
>
> If anyone is interested, tell me and I'll send the codes. I don't want
> to upload the codes in CVS at this moment. At least, I want to have a
> basic but compile-able one.
/Matti Aarnio
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:33 EST