Re: Problem with both CONFIG_FB_SIS_300 and CONFIG_FB_SIS_315

From: Thomas Winischhofer (tw@webit.com)
Date: Sat Feb 09 2002 - 07:57:37 EST

Next message: Wolfgang Rohdewald: "(no subject)"
Previous message: Mike Phillips: "[PATCH]IBMTR clean-up, removal of last isa_read/writes"
Maybe in reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Problem with both CONFIG_FB_SIS_300 and CONFIG_FB_SIS_315"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

you're right. Both options don't (yet) work together.

I have a new version of sisfb around the corner (partly new code from
SiS themselves). The code is currently in a testing phase and will be
committed as soon as it is stable.

The goal is to have the same code basis for the sisfb as well as the X
driver. This is under development - and it will solve the issue you
described as well.

For the status of the current development, see
http://www.webit.com/tw/linuxsis630.shtml

Thomas

-- 
Thomas Winischhofer
Vienna/Austria
mailto:tw@webit.com                  *** http://www.webit.com/tw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Wolfgang Rohdewald: "(no subject)"
Previous message: Mike Phillips: "[PATCH]IBMTR clean-up, removal of last isa_read/writes"
Maybe in reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Problem with both CONFIG_FB_SIS_300 and CONFIG_FB_SIS_315"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:26 EST