On Fri, 2002-02-08 at 18:51, Mark Hahn wrote:
> yes, but have you evaluated whether it's noticably better than
> other forms of locking? for instance, couldn't your dcache example
> simply use BR locks?
Good point.
One of the things with implicit locking schemes like RCU is that the
performance hit merely shifts. Reading the data may no longer have any
overhead, but the hit is taken elsewhere. One most be careful in
benchmarking RCU locking.
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:24 EST