Re: [patch] larger kernel stack (8k->16k) per task

• Next message: M.Bakker@research-int.com: "Guest section DW: "Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy io ports reservation"
• Previous message: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [patch] larger kernel stack (8k->16k) per task"
• In reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "[patch] larger kernel stack (8k->16k) per task"
• Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: [patch] larger kernel stack (8k->16k) per task"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> It is against 2.4.9 but should be easy to port in any direction. (One way
> the patch could be improved is by making the size CONFIG_ option instead
> of hardcoding). Oh btw, please don't tell me "but now you'd need _four_
> physically-contiguous pages to create a task instead of two!" because I
> know it (and think it's not too bad).

As a debugging tool its ok. Adding 8K to the kernel stack size
is a wonderful way to eat huge amounts of RAM though.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: M.Bakker@research-int.com: "Guest section DW: "Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy io ports reservation"
• Previous message: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [patch] larger kernel stack (8k->16k) per task"
• In reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "[patch] larger kernel stack (8k->16k) per task"
• Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: [patch] larger kernel stack (8k->16k) per task"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:18 EST