Re: CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI and early_serial_setup

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Fri Feb 08 2002 - 07:43:12 EST

Next message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI and early_serial_setup"
Previous message: Martin Dalecki: "Re: ?????????????????????"
In reply to: Geert Uytterhoeven: "CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI and early_serial_setup"
Next in thread: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI and early_serial_setup"
Reply: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI and early_serial_setup"
Reply: Pavel Machek: "Re: CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI and early_serial_setup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:25:07PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> If CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI=y, but CONFIG_SERIAL=m, the kernel (2.4.18-pre9) doesn't
> link because early_serial_setup() is not found.
>
> I think the correct fix is to not allow CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI, unless
> CONFIG_SERIAL=y.

Isn't CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI an ia64 only option ?

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI and early_serial_setup"
Previous message: Martin Dalecki: "Re: ?????????????????????"
In reply to: Geert Uytterhoeven: "CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI and early_serial_setup"
Next in thread: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI and early_serial_setup"
Reply: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI and early_serial_setup"
Reply: Pavel Machek: "Re: CONFIG_SERIAL_ACPI and early_serial_setup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:17 EST