Re: [RFC] New locking primitive for 2.5

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@ns.caldera.de)
Date: Fri Feb 08 2002 - 07:31:07 EST


In article <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202072305480.2976-100000@localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
> i think one example *could* be to turn inode->i_sem into a combi-lock. Eg.
> generic_file_llseek() could use the spin variant.

No. i_sem should be split into a spinlock for short-time accessed
fields that get written to even if the file content is only read (i.e.
atime) and a read-write semaphore.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:17 EST