Re: [RFC] New locking primitive for 2.5

From: Denis Vlasenko (vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua)
Date: Fri Feb 08 2002 - 07:47:24 EST


On 7 February 2002 17:56, yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:
> > If a spin_lock request is blocked by a mutex_lock call, the spin_lock
> > attempt also sleeps i.e. behaves like a semaphore.
>
> So what's the difference between combi_spin and combi_mutex?
> combi_spin becomes
> if not mutex locked, spin
> else sleep
> Bizzare

combi_spin_lock():
If not mutex locked, spin - will be released shortly
else sleep - may take long time before released
 * lock released *
spin lock it! <=== this is the difference -
                       combi_mutex_lock would mutex lock it here

What's wrong with this?

--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:16 EST