Re: BKL in tty code?

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Wed Jan 30 2002 - 16:01:27 EST


On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 02:25:59PM -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> It has less to do with lock contention and much more to do with the
> design of the tty / console layer. It isn't the kernel's prettiest
> code.
>
> There is probably some cleanup that is possible, but really getting the
> thing in gear (which means no BKL, which is probably the hardest part to
> rip out) require some level of rewrite.

I've been thinking about the serial layer, and its far from trivial.
Unless its done right, we'll end up with a mess of locks -> deadlock.

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:01:24 EST