preempt & ne2k

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@ucw.cz)
Date: Sun Jan 27 2002 - 15:52:53 EST


Hi!

> > testing the patch complaining about, AND one that seems like it could be
> > addressed by using IRQ disabling as a latency guard in addition to spinlocks.
>
> I dont believe anyone has tested the driver hard with pre-empt. Its not that
> this driver can't be fixed. Its that this is one tiny example of maybe
> thousands of other similar flaws lurking. There is no obvious automated way
> to find them either.

So.... you have shown performance problem in one driver. Maybe *bad*
performance problem, but only performance problem. There may be other
performance problems out there. And what?
                                                                Pavel

-- 
When do you have heart between your knees?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:00:46 EST