Em Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 06:22:03PM +0000, Anton Altaparmakov escreveu:
> At 17:42 24/01/02, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >Actually I prefer 'bool' to '_Bool', if this becomes a kernel standard.
>
> I would be in favour of this as it does make code more readable. I use it
> in ntfs tng quite a bit (but I just typedef a BOOL type myself).
>
> If it is added, then _please_ don't use '_Bool', that's just sick...
> 'bool', heck even 'BOOL' would be better than that!
I'd vote for bool, long are the days when I programmed COBOL in original
3270 terminals, heck it seems like it was in a previous life 8)
/me scratches head, I should go back and update the kernel janitor TODO
list with this...
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:00:23 EST