On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 07:32:18PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Again, preempt seems to reign supreme. Where is all the information
> > correlating preempt is inferior? To be fair, however, we should bench a
> > mini-ll+s test.
>
> How about some actual latency numbers ?
with an huge rescheduling rate (huge swapout/swapin load) and the
scheduler walking over 100 tasks at each schedule it is insane to
deduct anything from those numbers (-preempt was using O(1)
scheduler!!!!). so please don't make any assumption by just looking at
those numbers.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:44 EST